Search

O&P Library > Orthotics and Prosthetics > 1987, Vol 41, Num 4 > pp. 66 - 70

Orthotics and ProstheticsThis journal was digitally reproduced with permission from the American Orthotic & Prosthetic Association (AOPA).

Funding for this project was provided by the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists through a grant from the US Department of Education (grant number H235K080004). However, this does not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. For more information about the Academy please visit our website at www.oandp.org.



You can help expand the
O&P Virtual Library with a
tax-deductible contribution.

View as PDF

with original layout

An Alternative Casting Technique For Narrow ML Sockets

Justin Horowitz, C.P.O.*
Michael Lefton, C.P.O.*

INTRODUCTION

Many articles have been published with regard to new casting techniques for narrow ML socket design. All involve new methods or new equipment. The authors would like to present a new casting technique which will greatly cut down on cast modification time as well as the number of check sockets required.

We began a study on the possible application of the Berkley Brim for casting of a narrow ML socket. Taking a brim for the contralateral side, rotating it 90, the original posterior seat becomes the medial wall and the medial wall becomes the posterior seat. The Scarpus bulge contours to the posterior lateral region. With this brim, we were able to adjust the ML dimension.

Initially, we found that by utilizing the graph established by Mr. Long (Fig. 1A ) and the measurement data sheets designed by Mr. Sabolich and Mr. Shamp (Fig.1B ), we could select the appropriate brim. As we became more comfortable with the system, we found that we could select the appropriate brim size as if we were casting for a conventional quadrilateral socket, but using the contralateral brim.

CASTING

Following the brim selection, a circumferential gauge should be employed to establish your reduced ischial level measurement. Tube gauze is placed on the patient's residual limb and appropriately suspended. The brim is then placed around the limb and moved proximally to contact the ischial tuberosity. The gentle drawing downward of tissues may be required (Fig. 2 ). At this time, check the tissue distal to the brim for even continuity. Adjustments may be required by loosening or tightening the adjustments screws, but do not be concerned with any gaps that may occur between the limb and brim in the posterior region. In this region the residual limb, not the brim, will give you the appropriate contour (Fig. 3 ).

The brim is then removed from the limb, and the trochanter and distal femur are marked. At this time the brim is widened by 2.5 rotations of the adjustment screws. This allows for the thickness of the plaster. In addition, the brim is coated with silicone spray.

Elastic bandage is applied to the limb, covering at least a third of the gluteal musculature. The bandage is then brought into the perineum and drawn towards the inguinal region to finish at least 2" proximal to the trochanter. The proximal wrapping should be four layers thick. Continue wrapping the limb. Once the wrapping is completed, the brim is then applied. The brim will be hand held; The affected limb is held in a relaxed position (Fig. 5 ). With the brim being held firmly against the ischial tuberosity, view the fixture laterally (Fig. 5 ). The top of the brim is held in the same attitude as the limb. When viewing the brim anteriorly, just prior to the plaster setting, have the patient actively adduct, while keeping the brim horizontal (Fig. 6 ). This position is maintained until the plaster has hardened. At this point, a top coat of rigid plaster can be applied to the casting fixture and plaster wrap (Fig. 7 ). In addition, three layers of rigid plaster should be applied to the gluteal region from the brim proximally. Once these layers are hard the negative impression is removed and the length is verified. Positive model modifications are performed according to the previously mentioned authors.

CONCLUSION

This technique has been tried successfully on three patients. Two patients required only one check socket. Our third patient required two sockets due to weight loss and suction not being maintained. Because of a preshaped proximal portion of the positive model, modification time is reduced by half.


O&P Library > Orthotics and Prosthetics > 1987, Vol 41, Num 4 > pp. 66 - 70

The O&P Virtual Library is a project of the Digital Resource Foundation for the Orthotics & Prosthetics Community. Contact Us | Contribute