Search

O&P Library > Orthotics and Prosthetics > 1972, Vol 26, Num 2 > pp. 31 - 33

Orthotics and ProstheticsThis journal was digitally reproduced with permission from the American Orthotic & Prosthetic Association (AOPA).

Funding for this project was provided by the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists through a grant from the US Department of Education (grant number H235K080004). However, this does not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. For more information about the Academy please visit our website at www.oandp.org.



You can help expand the
O&P Virtual Library with a
tax-deductible contribution.

View as PDF

with original layout

Use of Photography in Cast Preparation

James H. Tyo *
George Hall, Jr., C.P. *

Cast modification may well be considered the single most important phase of prosthetic service because it is the key to the provision of a comfortable, functional socket. This is, obviously, the basis for all prosthetic treatment.

The prosthetist draws on a wealth of knowledge in preparing the plaster model, not the least of which is his memory of each individual amputation. It was felt that a method of recording the visual appearance of the stump at the time of casting might be quite helpful to the prosthetist.

The Polaroid "Big Shot" camera (Fig. 1 ), type 108 film, and battery-less magicubes were selected because of low initial investment, convenient operation, and the immediate results provided by the Polaroid process. The time added to the normal casting and measurement procedure is thus less than four minutes.

The basic procedure is quite simple. When possible, we position the patient against a dark background, normally a piece of brown paper taped to the cast room wall, and place an 18 in. ruler parallel to and directly beside the amputated side. On the stump, we mark the reference point for measurement of length (i.e., on the BK the patella tendon). The photo is taken from the front (Fig. 2 ).

There are obvious advantages when the photographs are used, the visual reminder of shape and condition being the most important (Fig. 3 ). There is, however, a secondary advantage. During the testing of this procedure, we noted an immediate improvement in patient response to treatment.

Our feeling at this time is that the patient responds to the quickly available photograph as a demonstration of our interest in offering the best prosthetic care possible. This, of course, is a highly subjective analysis that can only be proved by the passage of time.

This addition to the normal cast and measurement procedure should be viewed as just that, an addition. It is not a replacement, or substitute for thorough prosthetic examination of the stump, and not a "short-cut" method of recording prosthetic information. The procedure has been developed as an accurate, simple, and inexpensive means of providing a picture of the amputee's stump while preparing the plaster model. The prosthetist can "see" his patient, thus adding to the written information and his memory of shape, structure and texture.


O&P Library > Orthotics and Prosthetics > 1972, Vol 26, Num 2 > pp. 31 - 33

The O&P Virtual Library is a project of the Digital Resource Foundation for the Orthotics & Prosthetics Community. Contact Us | Contribute